<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Silver Spring Trails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org</link>
	<description>About building a network of trails in lower Montgomery County.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 23:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Wellness and the Purple Line/CCT by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2274&#038;cpage=1#comment-15276</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 23:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2274#comment-15276</guid>
		<description>Brian:

I think you are wrong on two counts:

1) The health benefit from a higher level of physical activity from Purple Line users will always overwhelm the health benefits from the physical activity from using the trail, whether the trail is extended or not.  That is because the transit users will always outnumber the trail users by an order of magnitude.

2) You say an improved trail can easily be built without the Purple Line.  Not true! The largest single improvement to get more benefit out of the trail would be to extend it into downtown Silver Spring as a direct off-road trail.  How do you propose to &quot;easily&quot; obtain the crucial CSX r.o.w. to make that possible?  Or do you have another route in mind? What is it?  Many people have been wanting to find an easy alternative to building the trail into Silver Spring along the CSX corridor, with no success.

Wayne Phyillaier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian:</p>
<p>I think you are wrong on two counts:</p>
<p>1) The health benefit from a higher level of physical activity from Purple Line users will always overwhelm the health benefits from the physical activity from using the trail, whether the trail is extended or not.  That is because the transit users will always outnumber the trail users by an order of magnitude.</p>
<p>2) You say an improved trail can easily be built without the Purple Line.  Not true! The largest single improvement to get more benefit out of the trail would be to extend it into downtown Silver Spring as a direct off-road trail.  How do you propose to &#8220;easily&#8221; obtain the crucial CSX r.o.w. to make that possible?  Or do you have another route in mind? What is it?  Many people have been wanting to find an easy alternative to building the trail into Silver Spring along the CSX corridor, with no success.</p>
<p>Wayne Phyillaier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wellness and the Purple Line/CCT by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2274&#038;cpage=1#comment-15275</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2274#comment-15275</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the discussion.  Your analysis assumes that the only way we can have a better trail connecting Bethesda and Silver Spring is if we build the Purple Line.  An improved trail, however, can easily be built without the Purple Line at a fraction of the cost.  With that in mind, I don&#039;t believe that an HIA will so &quot;clearly&quot; return a report favorable to the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the discussion.  Your analysis assumes that the only way we can have a better trail connecting Bethesda and Silver Spring is if we build the Purple Line.  An improved trail, however, can easily be built without the Purple Line at a fraction of the cost.  With that in mind, I don&#8217;t believe that an HIA will so &#8220;clearly&#8221; return a report favorable to the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wellness and the Purple Line/CCT by Woodsider</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2274&#038;cpage=1#comment-15267</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2274#comment-15267</guid>
		<description>Agree with Dan...excellent post.  As my old pal Mr. Spock says: &quot;the needs of the many outweight the needs of the few&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Dan&#8230;excellent post.  As my old pal Mr. Spock says: &#8220;the needs of the many outweight the needs of the few&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wellness and the Purple Line/CCT by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2274&#038;cpage=1#comment-15264</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2274#comment-15264</guid>
		<description>Thank you for a thorough response and your counterarguments.  The sections on tree cover, access to recreation, and the condition of the trail from the perspective of the Lyttonsville end give a needed balance to the objections from some on the Chevy Chase side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a thorough response and your counterarguments.  The sections on tree cover, access to recreation, and the condition of the trail from the perspective of the Lyttonsville end give a needed balance to the objections from some on the Chevy Chase side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cedar Street counter-flow bike lane by Skro</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=112&#038;cpage=1#comment-15183</link>
		<dc:creator>Skro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 06:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=112#comment-15183</guid>
		<description>Still, a bike lane is better than no bike lane...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, a bike lane is better than no bike lane&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is MoCo abandoning the MetBranch? by Chris Ibbotson</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=1846&#038;cpage=1#comment-15180</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ibbotson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 04:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=1846#comment-15180</guid>
		<description>I love to visit train stations, specially the older train stations. It really gives me some sort of Nostalgia during the old days.:&quot;*..

Kind thanks
&lt;a&gt;http://www.caramoan.ph&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love to visit train stations, specially the older train stations. It really gives me some sort of Nostalgia during the old days.:&#8221;*..</p>
<p>Kind thanks<br />
<a></a><a href="http://www.caramoan.ph" rel="nofollow">http://www.caramoan.ph</a>&#8220;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MTA shows latest plans for Silver Spring by Laurence Aurbach</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2198&#038;cpage=1#comment-14936</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Aurbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 18:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2198#comment-14936</guid>
		<description>I got it, thanks for the explanation. The &quot;stack&quot; is still a complicated and costly 3D puzzle, though. Is there any precedent for it -- is there any similar facility elsewhere in the world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got it, thanks for the explanation. The &#8220;stack&#8221; is still a complicated and costly 3D puzzle, though. Is there any precedent for it &#8212; is there any similar facility elsewhere in the world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MTA shows latest plans for Silver Spring by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2198&#038;cpage=1#comment-14934</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2198#comment-14934</guid>
		<description>@Laurence:

I doubt that taking the trail out of the stack will help the Purple Line much.  Remember that the Purple Line must be at about the fourth level to clear the CSX tracks where it crosses over at the north side of Colesville Road.  Railroad clearance standards are greater than are highway clearance standards. There may not be enough distance between that railroad crossover and the transit station platform for the Purple Line to drop down to the third level. (The Purple Line can&#039;t cross over any further north and still clear through the pinch point at the Metro Plaza building.)

If lowering the trail would help, it would be better to lower the trail to the second level as it was portrayed in earlier plans than to push it out of the transit center.  There would likely be conflicts with pedestrian traffic crossing to the MARC platforms at the second level, but that would be less damaging to the integrity of the trail than having the trail cross Colesville Road at-grade and use streets like Wayne and Ramsey, with more at-grade street crossings, to connect to the MetBranch Trail.

Waynep</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Laurence:</p>
<p>I doubt that taking the trail out of the stack will help the Purple Line much.  Remember that the Purple Line must be at about the fourth level to clear the CSX tracks where it crosses over at the north side of Colesville Road.  Railroad clearance standards are greater than are highway clearance standards. There may not be enough distance between that railroad crossover and the transit station platform for the Purple Line to drop down to the third level. (The Purple Line can&#8217;t cross over any further north and still clear through the pinch point at the Metro Plaza building.)</p>
<p>If lowering the trail would help, it would be better to lower the trail to the second level as it was portrayed in earlier plans than to push it out of the transit center.  There would likely be conflicts with pedestrian traffic crossing to the MARC platforms at the second level, but that would be less damaging to the integrity of the trail than having the trail cross Colesville Road at-grade and use streets like Wayne and Ramsey, with more at-grade street crossings, to connect to the MetBranch Trail.</p>
<p>Waynep</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MTA shows latest plans for Silver Spring by Laurence Aurbach</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2198&#038;cpage=1#comment-14933</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Aurbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2198#comment-14933</guid>
		<description>What about routing the CCT in a separated lane along 2nd Avenue? The road is wide enough and doesn&#039;t have huge car traffic volumes. The Purple Line could be dropped down to the third level. It would still be as intrusive as a freeway overpass, but every little bit helps.

The national double-stack standard is 22&#039;6&quot; -- does that force the Purple Line up to the fourth level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about routing the CCT in a separated lane along 2nd Avenue? The road is wide enough and doesn&#8217;t have huge car traffic volumes. The Purple Line could be dropped down to the third level. It would still be as intrusive as a freeway overpass, but every little bit helps.</p>
<p>The national double-stack standard is 22&#8242;6&#8243; &#8212; does that force the Purple Line up to the fourth level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MTA shows latest plans for Silver Spring by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2198&#038;cpage=1#comment-14921</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.silverspringtrails.org/?p=2198#comment-14921</guid>
		<description>@dan:

I think MTA is boxed into having the Purple Line be high by elevation requirements at both ends of the station.  At the north end, the Purple Line bridge that will bring the Purple Line from the west to the east side of the CSX tracks has a strict requirement of how much it must clear the CSX tracks (24&#039; clear, I believe).  At the south end, the Purple Line must be high enough so its structure clears &quot;Ripifant&quot; Road by a good margin (16&#039; would be a typical street clearance requirement).  Add to that the requirement that the Purple Line platform in the center of the station must be level, and there is little room for MTA to lower the track elevation between the needed high elevations at both the north and south ends.

I agree it will be a challenge to make this high structure not appear to be overbearing.  But the south side of the CSX/Metro tracks is lined with high office buildings that will still be much higher than any transit station or Purple Line structures.

waynep</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dan:</p>
<p>I think MTA is boxed into having the Purple Line be high by elevation requirements at both ends of the station.  At the north end, the Purple Line bridge that will bring the Purple Line from the west to the east side of the CSX tracks has a strict requirement of how much it must clear the CSX tracks (24&#8242; clear, I believe).  At the south end, the Purple Line must be high enough so its structure clears &#8220;Ripifant&#8221; Road by a good margin (16&#8242; would be a typical street clearance requirement).  Add to that the requirement that the Purple Line platform in the center of the station must be level, and there is little room for MTA to lower the track elevation between the needed high elevations at both the north and south ends.</p>
<p>I agree it will be a challenge to make this high structure not appear to be overbearing.  But the south side of the CSX/Metro tracks is lined with high office buildings that will still be much higher than any transit station or Purple Line structures.</p>
<p>waynep</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
